Knowledge is scattered
Policies, product notes and operational knowledge live in documents, chats and people’s heads, so answers depend on who is asked.
SERVICES / AI INTEGRATION
We integrate AI where it can be evaluated, explained and operated — not where it only looks impressive in a demo. The work starts with the data, the user decision and the evidence needed to trust the answer.
Policies, product notes and operational knowledge live in documents, chats and people’s heads, so answers depend on who is asked.
The demo answers a few questions well, but there is no evaluation set, access control, cost model or plan for wrong answers.
A workflow is automated before anyone defines who reviews exceptions, what is logged and how a bad output is corrected.
RAG systems that search approved sources, cite passages and respect the permissions of the person asking.
Assistive steps for drafting, classification, extraction and review, with a human decision where the risk requires it.
Connecting models to existing services, data and interfaces without making the product dependent on one vendor.
A test set, acceptance criteria, citations, cost and latency tracking, and a process for reviewing failures.
Understand your users, constraints and goals.
Agree the scope, approach and success criteria.
Develop in increments with visible progress and testing.
Release, document and plan what comes next.
Chunking, metadata and hybrid search shaped around the documents and questions that matter.
Questions with known answers, negative cases and human review to measure whether the system is useful.
Filtering by source, role and tenant before content is placed in a model’s context.
Latency, cost, failure handling and index refresh planned as part of the system, not after launch.
Define the decision, the sources and the evidence before choosing a model or interface.
Start with one workflow and a measured result, then expand only where the evidence supports it.
Exceptions and high-risk answers stay with a person, with the context needed to review them.
We integrate and evaluate existing models. Fine-tuning is considered only when the problem and evidence justify it; most business systems need better retrieval, permissions and evaluation first.
Only sources you approve. We map permissions first and filter results before they reach the model, so an answer cannot expose a document the user is not allowed to see.
With an evaluation set, source citations and human review. We report what the system can and cannot answer; we do not promise universal accuracy.
They depend on the model, context size and traffic. We measure both in the pilot and set a budget and fallback path before production.
The system should show its source, allow a correction path and log the failure. High-risk decisions remain with a human reviewer.
LET’S MAKE SOMETHING USEFUL
Tell us about your idea, the challenge and what success looks like. We’ll start with a thoughtful conversation about scope and fit.